TSTP Solution File: PUZ088^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : PUZ088^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:49:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : PUZ088^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:00:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.16/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oXXhPylZIx/Vampire---4.8_9571
% 0.22/0.38 % (9708)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9707)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9709)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9711)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9713)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.38 % (9709)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (9710)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9707)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, cLIKES: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 $false),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f16])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ($true != $true)),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f15,f12])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (($true = (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE))) )),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0] : ((cLIKES @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) != $true) & ! [X2] : ($true = (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE)) & ! [X3] : (($true = (cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X3)) | ! [X4] : ((cLIKES @ X3 @ X4) != $true))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0] : (? [X1] : ($true != (cLIKES @ X0 @ X1)) => ((cLIKES @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) != $true))),
% 0.22/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0] : ? [X1] : ($true != (cLIKES @ X0 @ X1)) & ! [X2] : ($true = (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE)) & ! [X3] : (($true = (cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X3)) | ! [X4] : ((cLIKES @ X3 @ X4) != $true))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X3] : ? [X4] : ((cLIKES @ X3 @ X4) != $true) & ! [X2] : ($true = (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE)) & ! [X0] : (((cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X0) = $true) | ! [X1] : ($true != (cLIKES @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X3] : ? [X4] : ((cLIKES @ X3 @ X4) != $true) & (! [X0] : (((cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X0) = $true) | ! [X1] : ($true != (cLIKES @ X0 @ X1))) & ! [X2] : ($true = (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ~((! [X0] : (? [X1] : ($true = (cLIKES @ X0 @ X1)) => ((cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X0) = $true)) & ! [X2] : ($true = (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE))) => ? [X3] : ! [X4] : ((cLIKES @ X3 @ X4) = $true))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ~((! [X0] : (? [X1] : (cLIKES @ X0 @ X1) => (cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X0)) & ! [X2] : (cLIKES @ X2 @ cBRUCE)) => ? [X3] : ! [X4] : (cLIKES @ X3 @ X4))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.22/0.38 ~((! [X1] : (? [X2] : (cLIKES @ X1 @ X2) => (cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X1)) & ! [X0] : (cLIKES @ X0 @ cBRUCE)) => ? [X3] : ! [X4] : (cLIKES @ X3 @ X4))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.22/0.38 (! [X1] : (? [X2] : (cLIKES @ X1 @ X2) => (cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X1)) & ! [X0] : (cLIKES @ X0 @ cBRUCE)) => ? [X3] : ! [X4] : (cLIKES @ X3 @ X4)),
% 0.22/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oXXhPylZIx/Vampire---4.8_9571',cTHM68A)).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cLIKES @ (sK0 @ cLYLE) @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f14])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ((cLIKES @ (sK0 @ cLYLE) @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f13,f11])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i] : (($true = (cLIKES @ cLYLE @ X3)) | ((cLIKES @ X3 @ X4) != $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cLIKES @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) != $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (9706)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (9705)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------